Voters are asking AI who to vote for. CampSight helps campaigns — and the orgs that support them — shape the answer.

Tom Steyer says California's housing crisis is fundamentally an affordability and supply problem, and his platform centers on dramatically increasing housing construction while lowering the cost of building.

His main housing proposals include:

• Building 1 million homes in four years through faster permitting, zoning reform, and reduced construction fees and taxes.

• Streamlining permitting and enforcing state housing laws so cities cannot block approved housing projects, especially dense housing near transit.

• Reducing construction costs by expanding prefab and modular housing, standardizing designs, and cutting regulatory delays.

• Supporting renters by expanding California's renter tax credit, enforcing statewide tenant protections, and preserving local rent control within the current framework.

• Limiting corporate home purchases by expanding "first look" programs that prioritize families and tenants over large investment firms buying homes.

• Using public land and public financing more aggressively to support affordable housing development.

The major candidates running for the 2026 U.S. Senate race in Maine are Susan Collins (Republican incumbent), Graham Platner (Democrat), David Costello (Democrat), and Tim Rich (Independent).

Since you care most about taxes and fiscal policy as a blue-collar worker, here's a ranking focused on taxes on working people, government spending, inflation/cost-of-living concerns, unions and wages, and energy/economic policy.

1. Susan Collins

Best fit if you want lower taxes overall, more moderate government spending, business-friendly economic policy, and a centrist Republican approach. Collins has historically supported portions of the Trump-era tax cuts, infrastructure and manufacturing spending, and bipartisan budgeting.

2. Graham Platner

Best fit if you want stronger labor/union policy, more aggressive action on wages and healthcare costs, and a progressive-leaning but practical Democrat approach.

3. David Costello

Best fit if you want a more traditional Democratic approach with an emphasis on state-level issues, local economic development, and working-class priorities.

Nevada's Question 7 (the voter ID amendment) is ultimately a values tradeoff between election security/confidence and ease of access to voting.

A good way to decide is to ask which risk concerns you more:

• Are you more worried about the possibility of fraud or reduced confidence in elections?
• Or are you more worried about eligible voters facing extra barriers to voting?

Arguments for YES:

• Voter ID is popular with many voters across party lines.
• IDs are already required for many everyday activities.
• Supporters believe it increases trust in elections and helps prevent impersonation fraud.

Arguments for NO:

• Proven cases of in-person voter fraud are rare.
• Some voters — elderly people, low-income residents, rural residents, students — may face more difficulty voting.
• Critics argue Nevada already has verification systems such as signature matching for mail ballots.

One additional consideration: because this is a constitutional amendment, approving it locks the policy in more firmly than an ordinary statute.